<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<Content xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns="urn:blueonionsoftware-com:bloget:runtime:data">
  <text>Here are the results of some recent unscientific tests between KinetDx-DS3000 and KinetDx-Cosmos.

&lt;pre&gt;
Performance testing (All times are in seconds)

KinetDx: (mainline build as of 5/13/05)

Images  KinetDx  KinetDx | Syngo
        Cosmos   DS3000  | Workplace
-----------------------------------
     1     2.69    1.88  |   2.50
     2     2.94    2.58  |   N/A
     4     2.91    2.62  |  11.93
     5     3.03    2.37  |   6.50
     
This test compares KinetDx running in Cosmos mode and
KinetDx running in DS3000 mode. The times for the Syngo
Workplace to perform similar tasks are shown for comparison

N/A = Not Available

Note: 2 image time for Syngo will be available later.
There is an issue with licensing that is perventing me
from running Syngo Workplace for the moment.

Test was conducted with a stopwatch. Times are from the 
moment a study is selected for viewing until all images 
are displayed.

KinetDx client: 2.4 GHZ Pentium 4, 1 Gig RAM
Cosmos Server:  2.4 GHZ Xeon, 3 Gig RAM
DS3000 Server:  Pentium II 450 MHZ, 500 MB RAM

Network, 100 mbs (Local Lan)

=============================
Fblob - Standalone
=============================

Time(s)  Size(bytes)
-----------------------------
0.98	    32,372
1.09	   229,504
0.96	    45,858
1.00	    30,850
9.56	62,312,444
1.00	    79,832

These are all single file transfers. This mirrors how KinetDx
retrieves images (albeit KinetDx uses multiple threads).
Server is the Cosmos server used in KinetDx workstation timings.
&lt;/pre&gt;</text>
  <last_update>2007-10-04T00:52:31.5800806Z</last_update>
  <source_title />
  <source_link />
  <comments />
  <references />
  <attachments />
</Content>